Read on! Again, tried to keep all settings as closely matched as possible, but invariably, there will be differences. Maybe I'm leaning towards the softer results from Redshift.
If anything, I'd say this is a testament to how the tools can influence your aesthetic one way or another. Despite my best efforts to keep all variables as equal as possible, the end result was very different. In the end, I wound up ditching the displacement maps and going with bump. Steam text formattingĭisplacement was especially difficult to wrangle. Took a bit of tinkering around, with lighting and materials. Not as straightforward as the Redshift version. The final image at x took about a minute and 30 seconds. Maybe it's because I've been using Redshift almost exclusively for so long now, that it all feels like second nature.Īlso, this was the fastest render of them all. So, I have to say - this was the easiest, most straightforward, most fun one to work on. But people love it so much - it must be worth another shot. Bsc 1st year physical chemistry important questions I have to admit - I'm extremely biased against it. Before I go throw my money at the Redshift team well-deserved! I decided to give its main competitors one more run at it. Seeing as how the Redshift Alpha testing period is now closed, it's decision time. Please change lights, materials, settings, etc. It's ok to say you have your gripes with X or Y renderer please elaboratebut anything beyond that insults, posturing, etc. All we ask is that you keep it civilized.
#Octane render vs redshift skin#
Skin Shaders in C4D with Octane & Redshiftīy nervAugust 3, in Topics.
0 kommentar(er)
